Paper Published! Assessment of nutrients and conductivity in the Wachusett Reservoir watershed: An investigation of land use contributions and trends (Summer 2023)

The quality of drinking water for the Boston Metropolitan Area, supplied by the Quabbin-Wachusett system, is impacted by environmental trends. The objectives of this study are to increase understanding of the role that small streams may play in degradation of reservoir quality by characterizing seasonal constituent patterns from 1998 to 2020 in the Wachusett Reservoir watershed and by developing enhanced modeling frameworks. Previous monitoring (1998–2012) exhibited increased loads due to increasing flows despite declining solute concentration. This present study analyzed seasonal nitrate (NO3) and total phosphorus (TP) concentration and load trends from 2012 to 2020 across 11 tributaries. Specific conductivity (SC) was also assessed to evaluate the impacts of road salt application. From 2012 to 2020, statistical results for mean nutrient concentrations suggest static or declining temporal trends, while SC in all tributaries exhibited increasing trends. Land use data suggest association with altered drainage landscapes as potential sources of increased constituent transport. Subbasins with the highest concentrations of TP, NO3, and SC have the largest percentage of impervious and cultivated areas, two to three times greater than other subbasins. Daily flows were modeled using the airGR hydrological model, subsequently used to calculate loads. Overall, flow magnitude was a more important load driver than long-term nutrient concentrations, thus, showing that stream discharge controlled load variability. On the other hand, persistently high SC levels controlled the increasing SC load trends. Finally, many nutrient reduction management strategies demonstrated an important impact from 1998 to 2020. Despite watershed programs aimed at reducing salt applications, concentrations in streams are increasing, indicating a long-term legacy of salt accumulation. Although smaller tributaries represent a modest portion of the system, addressing these sources has the potential to further reduce the long-term ecological impacts of reservoir constituent loading.

Carneiro Marques, A., Veras, C.E., Kumpel, E., Tobiason, J.E., Guzman, C.D., 2023. Assessment of nutrients and conductivity in the Wachusett Reservoir watershed: An investigation of land use contributions and trends. International Soil and Water Conservation Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.07.004

Paper Published! A Critical Review of the Global Use and Context of Trucked Water as a Potable Water Supply (Summer 2023)

This study aimed to analyze the global phenomenon of trucked water services, where potable water is delivered to homes. Through a literature review and analysis of data from 2009 to 2019, we estimated that 29.6 to 64.1 million people worldwide rely on trucked water, highlighting its widespread prevalence. Key themes included water quality, cost, operational contexts, management, and quantity supplied, shedding light on the reasons for and challenges associated with trucked water delivery.

Paper Published: “Effective first flush volumes in experimental household-scale rainwater catchment systems” (Summer 2023)

Rainwater collection systems typically incorporate a first flush mechanism to divert pollutants from stored rainwater, with the design usually based on capturing the initial 1-2 mL of rainfall. However, variations in the local environment and collection systems can affect the required first flush volume. We conducted experiments in Amherst, Massachusetts to evaluate rainwater quality per collection volume and time, finding variable dissolved organic carbon concentrations in first flush samples. Our results identify a need to tailor first flush designs that consider local precipitation patterns, storm intensity, and canopy conditions.

Charlebois B., Reckhow, D., Wittbold, P., E. Kumpel (2023). Effective First Flush Volumes in Rainwater Catchment Systems. AQUA – Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society. In publication. DOI:10.2166/aqua.2023.049

Is UMass right for me? Experiences of Postdoctoral Researcher Nelson da Luz (Winter 2023)

Nelson da Luz is a postdoctoral researcher in the Environmental and Water Resources Engineering group within the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at UMass.

Nelson poses with a duck next to the UMass campus pond, May 2022.

 

 

How did you become involved in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)?

To be completely honest, I didn’t even know what STEM was until I had already decided to go to Manhattan College for engineering, but even without that knowledge beforehand, I had already lived a childhood and adolescence that predisposed me to get involved in a technical profession. Some of my hobbies as a youth involved building with Lego and model rocketry. Around the age of 8, I said that I wanted to be an architect, tying together my interests in both art and construction. I generally excelled in mathematics and the sciences compared to my peers, so my high school guidance counselor suggested that I consider engineering. I gained some experience with the engineering style of design while I was completing my Eagle Scout project which also showed to me that I could possibly be successful in a technical profession. My time in the Boy Scouts also led me to gain a strong appreciation and desire to protect the natural environment. All these things in combination are what led me to become involved in STEM.

 

How did you choose environmental engineering?

I specifically got into environmental engineering while I was taking the course “Environmental Engineering Principles” as a sophomore at Manhattan College. I became more interested in water topics from taking that class and ended up incorporating those interests into my extra-curricular activities. I was part of the Catholic Relief Services Campus Ambassador program, and because of my interest in water, I was appointed to lead a committee focused on water and sanitation. The pivotal point in my story came in January 2014, on a service-immersion trip to Haiti as part of Manhattan College’s Lasallian Outreach Volunteer Experience. Throughout our trip, we used 5-gallon water jugs for our drinking water. The water from the tap at the Lasallian Christian brother’s house where we stayed was not safe to drink. A few days into our stay at the brothers’ house we had used 8 of those water jugs. When one of the brothers told Brother Nicolai, the oldest brother in the house, that there were no more water jugs left, he was left in a state of pure amazement. He said it was impossible. I had filled my water bottle three quarters full at this point and when I realized what the brothers were talking about, I stopped filling my bottle. I was both embarrassed and astonished at the amount of water we had used in such a short amount of time. And that was just drinking water. It didn’t include the water we used for washing our hands and showering. I realized that something was wrong, on a higher level. Why was it that the brothers didn’t have a consistently available and quality water source? It was something to reflect on throughout the rest of the day while we were doing a service project in the local community. It was something to reflect on when the people that were helping us from the community asked if anyone had an extra water pouch because they were thirsty and didn’t have one.

Nelson and others on a service-immersion trip to Haiti through Manhattan College Lasallian Outreach Volunteer Experience, January 2014.

After we finished the project, we sat down with the group of men we had been working with throughout the day and had a really powerful conversation. Both sides, our group, and the men we worked with, asked each other some hard questions. One question that stood out to me though was this: “What are your hopes for the future? Your desires?” When it came to my turn, I spoke words that changed the course of my life for good, a defining moment. I replied, “I want to help people get clean water.” I had a chance to think about what I said for the rest of the day, and by the time that our evening reflection came around, I realized something very important. I realized that when I said those words, “I want to help people get clean water”, I truly meant it. They were words that I said before I left for the trip, but for the first time, I knew that I truly meant them. From that point forward, I’ve committed my professional life to be part of the world’s efforts to increase access to clean water in the environment and for supplying folks with clean drinking water.

 

What is your background before starting at UMass?

Before UMass, as described above, I went to Manhattan College. While there I was heavily involved with campus ministry and social action, particularly on topics related to water and sanitation. After completing my bachelor’s degree, I continued there to earn my master’s degree in environmental engineering doing research under Dr. Kevin Farley. During my master’s work, I was involved in environmental modeling projects including modeling bioaccumulation of hydrophobic organic contaminants in benthic invertebrates and modeling sediment transport in the freshwater-tidal section of the Hudson River in New York. My experiences in graduate research along with the kind support of Manhattan College faculty led me to consider earning my doctorate. I applied to a few institutions, but ultimately ended up choosing UMass, where I’ve now been since Fall 2017!

 

Why did you decide to come to UMass?

Out of all the programs to which I applied, UMass ended up being the best choice for a few reasons. Firstly, the research opportunities offered by Dr. Kumpel were the most enticing of the different places that I had considered. The reason I found the research interesting was on account of my previous involvement in water and sanitation efforts during my time at Manhattan College. It seemed very cool to me, to be able to do that type of work in an academic setting. Secondly, I found the UMass EWRE community quite welcoming. I remember when I was on my visit to campus before choosing to attend UMass, that some of the graduate students invited the visitors over to their home, which helped me to get a better sense of the community and character of the folks I could potentially be working alongside during my doctoral studies. I had also gotten somewhat familiar with UMass earlier while participating in the Northeast Graduate Student Water Symposium (NEGSWS) twice while I was a master’s student at Manhattan College.

Kumpel Lab Group Presents at UNC Water and Health (Fall 2022)

Interview with Graduate Student – Amanda Carneiro Marques (Fall 2022)

Amanda Carneiro Marques is a PhD candidate in Environmental and Water Resources Engineering, co-advised by Emily Kumpel and Christian Guzman. She shared with us her experiences as a grad student at UMass.  

What’s your background?

I got my bachelor’s degree in Water Resources and Environmental Engineering at Federal Fluminense University, Brazil. During my undergraduate studies, I had the opportunity to spend a year at Roger Williams University (Rhode Island, US), where I got a minor degree in Sustainability Studies. After that, I completed my master’s degree in Civil Engineering, focused on Water Resources Management, at Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Brazil. During my master’s studies, the focus of my research was sustainable water resources planning under climate change. I also worked full-time at a water treatment and distribution company and at a watershed management agency in Brazil. I worked in several projects involving partnerships with environmental conservation agencies in Brazil and in the US during all these years. I would say that my background is very related to water planning and management, water quality assessment, and sustainable water supply. My main purpose was always trying to help with the need of providing safe and reliable water to people, taking into account different environmental and social aspects that are related to the diverse context of distinct communities.  

What made you want to do a PhD?

I am very passionate about research, I am a very curious person, and I love to constantly learn new things. I also know that not everyone has the same access to educational opportunities like this. I was motivated to do the PhD because I believed it was a way to use my skills to work towards making science more accessible, equitable, collaborative, and inclusive to a broader community.  

Amanda presenting her research at the European Geosciences Union conference.

Why did you want to do research with Dr. Kumpel and Dr. Guzman?

When reading about their research and talking to them, I realized that our interests aligned and that we shared similar ideals. I believe that the most important thing when choosing an advisor and mentor is to understand that you have similar purposes for your research. Both of them work towards providing safe water access to the community and to make science more inclusive, and sharing those interests is very important for me to feel motivated to continue to overcome research challenges and academic barriers.  

What made you want to come to UMass?

I was very enthusiastic about the Environmental and Water Resources Program at the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department here at UMass. The courses were very interesting and presented broad perspectives on several topics. I also really liked how the faculty was interdisciplinary, and how they collaborate with each other to get different perspectives on how to deal with environmental issues and advance science. I really like cooperative environments and to be in a place where I feel my insights are appreciated.  

Can you describe your research?

My research is related to assessing water quality in a water supply watershed. I analyze surface water quality data to characterize contaminants’ seasonal patterns and to identify potential sources of pollutants through land use assessment. It also includes the investigation of contaminant transport, potential pollutant pathways, and surface-groundwater interactions using environmental tracers and stable isotopes to understand the dynamics of a given constituent and how persistent this pollutant is in the natural environment, supporting the water management and decision-making process. I also use reservoir water quality modeling as a tool to evaluate how changes in management and conservation strategies would impact a drinking water supply watershed.

Quabbin Reservoir, Western-Central Massachusetts.

  What advice do you have for someone considering research or graduate school?

I would say that graduate school is an exquisite opportunity for learning, exchanging experiences, developing skills, and getting new perspectives. I would also say that not always it is an easy process and that there are a lot of challenges to be overcome along the way. It is important to be truthful to yourself, understanding your limitations, and working with people to overcome barriers. There is an excellent community of people ready to talk through your problems and help you to find solutions. Sharing concerns, asking for help, and connecting with others is extremely important to keep your mind engaged and your projects moving forward. And lastly, I would say to try to enjoy the process instead of focusing only on the final goal because it is an extremely interesting experience.

 

Interview with Graduate Student – Hannah Wharton

We sat with lab alum Hannah Wharton to ask about her experience as a UMass graduate student in Dr. Kumpel’s lab. Hannah received her BS in Civil Engineering from UMass in 2019, and she recently graduated with her MS in Civil Engineering with a focus in Environmental and Water Resources.

What made you want to pursue a master’s degree?

I really enjoy research and find it genuinely fulfilling to explore a research question, especially in the WASH field, where there are so many applications that work towards improving public health outcomes. I also greatly enjoy working with students and teaching, so I hope to become a professor. Knowing I would need my PhD to achieve this goal, I decided that I would do a master’s degree first to gain more research experience and learn more about teaching. 


Why did you want to do research in Dr. Kumpel’s lab?

Ever since high school, I have been interested in WASH and how to provide safe drinking water to people who do not currently have access to it. In undergrad, I worked with Emily in Engineers Without Borders and then on a project on the removal of E. coli by standard POU devices. Emily’s research on WASH and intermittent water supply has many applications in improving public health in many low- and middle-income communities. In addition, her expertise in the area was an amazing learning opportunity. I hope to help people gain access to safe drinking water through this scope of research. 

Can you describe your thesis work?

I studied the fate and transport of E. coli in intermittent water supply systems compared to continuous water supply through running our pilot-scale pipe loops. In addition, I looked at the persistence of E. coli in chloraminated water and whether the E. coli was incorporated into the biofilm or remained solely in the bulk water. I hope this information provides insight into managing bacterial water quality in intermittent water supply systems.

What are your plans moving forward?

I will be starting my PhD in environmental engineering at UC Berkeley this fall.

What advice do you have for someone considering research or graduate school?

I have found research and grad school to be some of the most fulfilling and meaningful work I have ever done. I have learned so much from my professors and peers and love the continued growth that comes from working at a research institution. I am so grateful for the opportunities I have been provided with during grad school so far and would highly encourage anyone considering grad school to go for it. The people I have worked with have made it an incredible experience, and I am so happy and grateful to be here!

Interview with Graduate Student – Savannah Wunderlich

Research interview with Savannah Wunderlich:

Author: Stephen Stamegna

Background:Savannah Wunderlich is a Masters student in the Environmental and Water Resources engineering program and a graduate member of the Kumpel Research Group and Hydrosystems Research Group at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, currently pursuing a degree in the field of water resources management.

Q:     Could you tell me a little bit about your project?

A:     Basically, there is a set of researchers within the Hydrosystems Research Group who are studying and building a simulation model of the water supply system in Mexico City. The purpose of this is to provide the decision makers in the city with a tool that they can use to evaluate different improvement measures that they can take when updating their water supply. The model currently operates under the assumption that everyone in Mexico City receives their water from the tap. However, in reality, a lot of people receive their tap water intermittently, and so rely other sources such as water trucks and bottled water at the household level. Therefore, what I’m contributing to this project is a household level model that considers these other water supply sources. The overlap with Dr. Kumpel’s research group is the household level analysis and the incorporation of intermittent supply.

Q:        What do you hope to achieve through this research?

A:        The ultimate goal is to build a large model that can be handed off to decision makers in Mexico City that they can use compare potential improvement options that can be made to the water supply system.

Q:        As of now, what are your materials and methods for conducting your study?

A:       Right now, all of my work is computer-based MATLAB analysis of existing water availability and pricing data to determine where households are actually getting their water from. When a household runs out of city-supplied water due to intermittent supply, it is important to determine what the next best option is in terms of source water. We are assuming that a household will make an optimal decision to maximize their water supply while minimizing their costs to determine which sources they will use.

Q:        Have you experienced any complications in your research?

A:        Yes. I have not been exposed to programming since my early undergraduate career. Therefore, this level of programming has been a learning curve but an enjoyable process nonetheless.

Q:        Have you figured out how to solve these complications?

A:        As I work through the problems, I am finding that trial-and-error has been the main method for overcoming programming issues. Additionally, there are other lab group members who are more experienced in programming who have been able to lend me their knowledge as well.

Q:        How does your research relate to the research group at large?

A:        My research is similar to Dr. Kumpel’s research because I’m analyzing intermittent supply and alternative sources of water. The Kumpel Research Group has expertise in intermittent supply and household surveys which has been really helpful in my work.

Q:        Why did you get involved in research?

A:        Research is something that I didn’t have much of a chance to get involved in during my undergraduate career. I think it’s such a rich component of the academic experience, and I knew that I wanted to do a research-based graduate degree so that I could expand my horizons.

Q:       Why do you like your project in particular?

A:        I really like that it’s a cross between two very different research groups. Programming, which is a large part of the Hydrosystems Research Group, is a very useful skill to learn. Meanwhile, the Kumpel Research Group provides exposure into the more nuanced field of household decision making.

Interview with Graduate Student – Nelson da Luz

Research Interview with Nelson da Luz:

Author: Stephen Stamegna

Background: Nelson da Luz is a Ph.D. student in the Environmental and Water Resources engineering program and a graduate member of the Kumpel Research Group at the University of Massachusetts Amherst currently pursuing a degree in the field of drinking water quality and supply.

Q:        Could you tell me a little bit about your project?

A:       My main project that I’m focused on is drinking water quality sampling programs (drawing a sample of water from a portion of a system to analyze it for different parameters). So, what I’m thinking about is what makes a sampling program “representative.” In other words, is the program intended to represent the entire distribution system or part of the system? Another broad question that I’m exploring that is dependent on the concept of “representation” is whether the sampling program is protective of human health or if it meets some other objective.  In relation to these questions, I’m investigating if a sampling program is representing a specific thing, when and where is the best time and place to sample for different water quality parameters.

Q:        What do you hope to achieve through this research?

A:        The reason behind this research is that the guidance that is provided to utilities is often very broad. Regulation agencies simply tell utilities to make their sampling programs “representative,” but do not provide much guidance as to what this entails. At the end of the day, hopefully this research will provide agencies and utilities with a better idea of what “representative” means. Adapting this term to specific goals is also important rather than using it as a blanket term.

Q:        As of now, what are your materials and methods for conducting your study?

A:       I’m working with an EPANET water quality model that simulates a network of pipes and the junctions at which water is withdrawn from the network for sampling purposes. The first step is to run a hydraulic model of the distribution system to validate the hydraulics of the system and eliminate errors. For instance, ensuring that sufficient quantities of water are flowing throughout the entire system and that there is enough pressure at all locations. The second step is using the EPANET model to analyze water quality parameters throughout the distribution system. The main parameter that I’m examining is chlorine concentration. In EPANET, this means that you have to assign a chlorine dose at the sources (treatment plants or any water source) and then assign reaction coefficients for chlorine decay. Then you run the model that follows the logic of a mass balance to determine the differential quantities of chlorine throughout the distribution system.

EPANET Water Quality Model Output

Q:       Have you experienced any complications in your research?

A:        Yes. For some reason, when you first look at the display on EPANET, it looks like an accurate map of a distribution system. However, the scale that is shown on the screen is not always accurate. In other words, a pipe length in one section appears to be the same as a pipe in another section. In reality, they are not the same length. In the beginning, I assumed the map was to scale. Now, I’m going back to ensure that the model in EPANET matches real physical properties such as pipe length. I also have had some complications when it comes to coding; it is a bit of a process to determine the optimal data structures to use for my analyses.

Q:        Have you figured out how to solve these complications?

A:        Most of them, yes. I’ve been able to use a combination of tools in ArcGIS and coding in R programming language to correct many of the issues with the EPANET model.

Q:        How does your research relate to the research group at large?

A:        My research examines a continuous supply distribution system while a lot of what the research group focuses on is intermittent water supply. However, the overarching questions around when and where to sample for water quality still remain regardless of whether you are sampling in a continuous distribution system, intermittent distribution system, or even a natural water system.

Q:        Why did you get involved in research?

A:        At the core of this question, I have a desire to contribute to the studies that revolve around helping people to obtain clean drinking water. In 2014, I went on a trip to Haiti and I saw a lot of the issues surrounding water scarcity. I felt a strong call to serve the mission of helping people to get clean water. As time progressed, there were opportunities in research that were presented to me. I completed my bachelor’s and master’s degrees at Manhattan College which is where I was first exposed to research. Through those experiences, I felt that research was a great avenue to use my skills to serve this greater mission.

Q:        Why do you like your project in particular?

A:        I like it because it explores questions that not many people have dedicated a lot of thought to at this level of detail. I’m also able to use a large variety of tools to achieve my goals; I’m using EPANET, coding in R, and ArcGIS. This keeps the project exciting and different.

Interview with Graduate Student – Mimi Alkattan

Research Interview with Mimi Alkattan:

Author: Stephen Stamegna

Background:Mimi Alkattan is a Ph.D. student in the Environmental and Water Resources engineering program and a graduate member of the Kumpel Research Group at the University of Massachusetts Amherst currently pursuing a degree in the field of drinking water quality.

Q:       Could you tell me a little bit about your project?

Panoramic photo of the pilot-scale pipeloops

A:      My project investigates intermittent water supply (IWS) using a pilot scale-model of a water distribution system. This allows us to conduct experiments comparing intermittent water supply and continuous water supply. We’re mostly concerned with how intermittency impacts water quality; we know it has negative impacts on water quality, but we would like to gain a more specific understanding.

Q:        What do you hope to achieve through this research?

A:        The main objective is to gain a better understanding of how intermittency affects water quality. This would help us to develop solutions to better maintain water quality in intermittent systems.

Q:        As of now, what are your materials and methods for conducting your study?

A:       There are different components to the materials and methods we use for the intermittent water supply study. First, our experimental setup is pilot-scale and it includes 2 identical recirculating pipeloops that model drinking water distribution systems. The two pipeloops consist of 22 feet of 2-in PVC, a pump, and a 10-gallon reservoir. One is used as a continuous control while the other models intermittency. Second, we measure different water quality parameters such as pH, DO, temperature, turbidity, chloramine concentrations, heterotrophic plate count (HPC), and total iron concentrations. We measure those parameters with different instruments in the lab. The third part of our methods is one of the most important things that we want to characterize; these are the biofilms that grow on the on the inner surfaces of the pipe walls. In order to sample these biofilms, we use biofilm sampling coupons. The coupons are removable plugs made of 22-millimeter disks cut out from the pipe walls. They can be removed after experimentation so that we can analyze the composition of the biofilms and determine biofilm thickness.

Q:       Have you experienced any complications in your research?

A:        Definitely. The really exciting thing about my research is that very few people have performed lab-based experimentation on intermittent water supply. Therefore, the main complication is that there are not any clearly defined methods on how to conduct the research. This means that I have to piece together how to do my research from different fields and develop some of the methods on my own. Another complication is that there are a lot of various components to the pipeloops (valves, sensors, gauges, meters, pumps, etc.) and they don’t always fit together on the first try.

Q:       Have you figured out how to solve these complications?

A:        Usually, the issues can be solved in a couple of tries through trial and error.

Q:        How does your research relate to the research group at large?

A:        Two of the major focuses of our research group are drinking water distribution systems and international water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH). My research lies at the intersection of both of those issues since IWS is common in low- and middle-income countries.

Q:        Why did you get involved in research?

A:        When I was a senior in high school, I took an environmental science class and it was the first time I realized that clean drinking water is a global challenge. That motivated me to go to college and study environmental engineering. I became very interested in research because it helps to develop solutions for these global drinking water challenges.

Photo of a biofilm coupon to scale 

Q:        Why do you like your project in particular?

A:        I am really excited to be working on my project because it involves the things I’m really interested in such as drinking water, water distribution, water quality, public health, and issues of inequity. Also, my project allows me to learn a lot of different things including experimental setup, microbiological methods, and more about water distribution piping, fittings, connections, and sensing.