Final Exam – Friday, December 18

4:00 – 6:30 PM      Thompson Hall 102/104

Cumulative exam, 41 questions (each question is worth 3.0000000 points for a total of 120 points.  so one Q could lead to bonus points)

Final and Answers

The exam was scaled by adding 6 points to every exam, as two questions were a little weird.  Absolutely correct, mind you, but they tested weirdly.  So the resulting exam average was 82.3 points (27.4 Q correct).

Practice exam (From Prof. Adams, 2008)

University Exam Policy

For extraordinary reasons, I can offer a final exam at a time other than the normal time – contact me ASAP for more information.  But please make sure that your reason is a good one (see the Univ. Exam. Policy).

Wednesday Final Exam Review Session 6:30 PM, ISB 135

Thursday: Extra Review Session 6:00 PM ISB 135

MAKEUP: Saturday Dec. 12 at 10:30AM (LGRT 703)

****TEST #3 **** ***During Regularly Scheduled Class***

Histogram of scores (avg = 70, dev. = 18)

EXAM3_with_Answers

Study guide for Exam 3

Info Sheet

Practice Exam (2008, Adams)

The exam will cover chapter 8 and 9.1, 9.2

Molecular Geometries

Review for Midterm 3

Friday December 4

4:40pm ISB 135 (Prof. Botch will lead)

Links to help you review bonding concepts:

Hybridization.pdf sigma/pi.pdf

movies for sigma/pi bonding in C2H4: sigma pi both

Polar molecule interactive

Lewis dot structures, formal charges, bond order, etc – review it.

The makeup for Exam 2 will be on Tuesday, November 10 at the very popular time of 8:00AM – 9:00AM.  This is due to the limited availability of rooms for testing use.

It will be in ISB 221.
It will be 26 questions, multiple choice in format.  Bring pencils and a calculator.

****TEST # 2 ***** ***During Regularly Scheduled Class***

Answers for Exam 2:  ExamView – Test2, 2009

Announcements:

1)The material covered for this exam was more difficult than that of the first exam – it is normal for the scores to be a little lower.  Average = 64, as calculated below. I will post a histogram tomorrow.

2) The exam scores were calculated as follows:  (# correct)x(4) + 4 = score.

3) one question was worded poorly, so I gave everybody 4 points for that question (see above)

4) the exam answer key had a mistake on each exam form: The correct answer to ion radius is Br- (Form A, #14; varies from form to form).  This mistake was corrected prior to calculating the scores above.

5) In order to help normalize scores, I will do the following: Your percentage score on the final exam will replace that of your lowest midterm, provided that this will improve your score. (eg: MT = 62/100, final = 90/120.  Your MT score would get dropped, and replaced by a “75”.)