Prince (2017) Representing OT Grammars

Direct link: http://roa.rutgers.edu/content/article/files/1657_prince_1.pdf

ROA: 1309
Title: Representing OT Grammars
Authors: Alan Prince
Comment:  
Length: 26
Abstract: Analysis proceeds with varying degrees of faithfulness to the theory that it rests on. Within OT, a commonly encountered chokepoint is the representation of grammars, which not infrequently have a form that differs from expectation. A variety of table types and graphical structures are deployed in the literature to handle the eventualities; many are not up to the task and impose their own debilitating artifacts.

 

This note sets out to determine where the common representational schemes succeed and where they fail in representing the content of OT grammars. Discussion begins by settling on a notion of grammar that accords with the general meaning of the term within Generative Grammar. Definition in hand, we assess the VT (violation tableau), the dashed VT, the Hasse Diagram, the set of Hasse diagrams, the dotted Hassoid, and the CT (comparative tableau), arguing mostly from familiar examples. Concrete conclusions are drawn about best (and non-best) practices.

 

Contents

 

0 Introductory

1 The VT and its discontents

1.1 Dashed hopes

2 A Gathering of Arcs

3 A Grammar of ERCs

4 Make straight the way

5 Practices make perfect

5.1 The VT

5.2 The CT

5.3 The Hasse Diagram

5.4 Don’t Go There

6 Conclusion

 

Appendix I Grammar and Inversion

Appendix II The legs of (C)V.ins

Appendix III The dotted Hassoid

 

References

Type: Paper/tech report
Keywords: formal analysis, analytical technique

 

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Posted in Research (e.g. papers, books)