Quick Thoughts About the Field of 65
***Before I get to the post, I want to let all six of you that read the blog that I’m moving to a new website, hopefully to get a whole eight people to follow me. My next post will be on this website and this one will be for the most part extinct (I’m moving all of my old posts over to the new website probably tomorrow). The new website is http://mattybsportsblog.blogspot.com/. ***
It’s been about 20 minutes since they’ve released the brackets (this post probably won’t be finished or go up until about 2 hours after, but I’m writing this in real time). Couple thoughts about the selections.
-The lack of mid-majors in this tournament is going to really hold down this tournament compared to previous years. Only mid-majors got into the tournament with at-large bids. Two things about this: Don’t the great mid-major teams always make games just a little more interesting when you’re picking through your bracket? If I had to choose a game like Illinois-Creighton it would be a legitimate tug of war in ym head for a solid 10 minutes checking obscure bizarre facts to try and rationalize it either way. I feel like there are maybe 3 games like that in this field. Secondly, in a season as bizarre as this, where every team has proved to be completely vulnerable, why would you not want great mid-major teams in this tournament??? You’re telling me with the right draw Saint Mary’s couldn’t get to the Sweet Sixteen,or at least get 25,000 idiots to pick them that far (myself included). This tournaments going to be a battle of terrible and great major conference teams rather than a battle of great mid-major teams and great major teams. This definitely has potential to be the worst tournament I’ve seen in the 8 years I’ve been watching it on a religious level. And Arizona getting in, not even as a 15 or 14 (like they should have been), but as a 12, is far and away the biggest gaffe the selection committee has ever made. I really am convinced there was a 4 drink miminum before entering the selection war room today.
-The Big Ten does not deserve seven teams. Period. There is no offense and I refuse to believe there is defense. Did you know only one team in the Big Ten shoots 46% or better? Should we contribute this to defense or just terrible shot selection. I’m sorry but I don’t care what defense you’re playing, you are not holding a game in the shot clock era to a 38-33 score. It means you shoot like 12 year old girls. And they didn’t even get the seven best teams! How does Penn State finish 5th in this conference and not get into the tournament? Imagine if they left a 5 seed in the ACC like Clemson out of the tournament? There would be riots in the street and everyone would protest the tournament.
-Just thought of something: those mid-major bids? Of the four, two went to A-10 teams. At this point, can we truly count the A-10 as a mid-major? After St. Joe’s season in 2004, Dayton and Xavier consistently being in the top 25 for all of the season, how can we possibly call them a mid-major? If they were on the fence before, we can definitely throw them on the “major conference” boat now. So that means only two mid-majors got into the tournament without winning their tourney: Gonzaga (peaking at the right time), and Butler (top 25 all year). Just inexcusible on all levels.
-Hubert Davis brought this up on ESPNU Bracketology, and I thought the same thing during Championship week. Not to make excuses for the terrible job the selection committee did, but a lot of the conference tournament were won by teams that has absolutely no right winning them: Mississippi State, Cleveland State, Temple, USC come immediately to mind. With this, they couldn’t just throw the conference favorites (LSU, Butler (a BIGGG one), Xavier (ditto), and UCLA) out into the rain, especially when two of those favorites probably would have made the tournament regardless. If they don’t win the tournament, do Mississippi State, Cleveland State, Temple, or USC get into the tournament? I say maybe USC, but the other three don’t have a snowball’s chance in hell. I say they should have left an A-10 team (probably Dayton) and a weak SEC team (Tennessee, another abomination in getting a 9 seed) out of the tournament and let in Saint Mary’s and Creighton.
- I thought at one point during ESPNU Bracketology that Dick Vitale was going to rip Jay Bilas’s face off. What I learned during the argument, more than anything about the tournament, is that Jay Bilas is the biggest asshole in the universe. I always thought he was a littl stuck-up being he went to Duke and all, but this just takes the cake. I can do his job, be a million more times diplomatic, and not talk down to Dick Vitale, and be loved by millions. Do we really need assholes like Jay Bilas and Skip Bayless to balance out all the good people in this analyst business? I say no.
-Finally, I really feel bad for the Siena Saints, and not just because they’re my babies. The point of being a mid-major evidently means “you play an inferior schedule and therefore don’t deserve a good seed, in fact you should be lucky to be in at all”, at least that’s what previous history, and especially this year, implies. So how does Siena, in this year in which if you didn’t win your conference you were essentially dead in the water, get a 9 seed? So they can win the right to get demolished by a Louisville team who is reaching the highest Karma rating of all time? (Karma ratings coming later in the week…don’t worry I’ll explain everything.) Does anyone have a problem switching their 9 seed with USC’s 10, especialy when USC won the Pac-10?? Then imagine what you have: USC knocks over the tip of the iceberg by beating Ohio State by 27, Siena breezes in an “upset” of Boston College, USC has the athletes to at least give Louisville a game in the second round, and Siena collapses the foundation of the Big Ten by upsetting #2 Michigan State. After that, how far does Siena go? Do they beat a shaky Kansas/good West Virginia team in another upset and go to the Elite Eight? And then at that point, do they have the momentum to possibly upset Louisville? I mean, we’ve seen George Mason do it, right? Nope, they win a first round game by 35 and take a turd sandwich in the face from Louisville.
This is the reason I need to be the sober one on the Selection Committee.
Comments(0)