Project Management and the Art of Peace

Ludmilla Pavlova's thoughts on Sustainability and Project Management for Design and Construction

Happy New Year!

Posted by lpavlova on December 31st, 2010

Morihei Ueshiba, or Osensei (great teacher) created Aikido in the early 1940s. A master of several classical Japanese martial arts (budo) including judo, kendo and jujitsu, Osensei developed Aikido to respond to the modern world.

According to his son, Kisshomaru Ueshiba, Aikido is orthodox because it inherits the spiritual and martial tradition of ancient Japan. But Osensei concluded that the true spirit of budo cannot be found in a competitive atmosphere where brute force dominates and the goal is victory at any cost. Instead, the path of Aikido leads to “victory over self” and is realized in the quest for self perfection of body, mind and spirit.

Much of project management is practicing the art of reconciliation, of finding consensus among multiple parties and narrowing to the “sweet spot” of design where many problems are solved by means of a singular design form, choice of material and/or method of manufacture.  Becoming a successful project manager requires discipline and knowledge.  Aikido is my way toward self-knowledge and mastery, and it brings me insight that is indispensable regardless of what I do, but particularly in my professional practice.

Here is an inspiring New Year resolution from Osensei:

Use your body to create forms; use your spirit to transcend forms; unify body and spirit to activate the Art of Peace.

Posted in Aikido | No Comments »

LEED Green Associate Study Group

Posted by lpavlova on October 7th, 2010

As Chair of the USGBC MA Chapter Lake Hitchcock Committee I am happy to announce our LEED Green Associate Study Group!  Here are the details:

Description: The LEED G.A. Study Group is offered by the USGBC MA Chapter Lake Hitchcock Committee as an educational opportunity for individuals who are interested in qualifying for the LEED Green Associate accreditation.

Format:  Self-directed, participatory study group facilitated by members of the Lake Hitchcock committee who are seasoned green building professionals with LEED BD+C accreditation.  

Materials:  Participants must obtain a personal copy of the LEED Green Associate study materials and are expected to come to each session having reviewed the material and prepared questions for clarification. (see http://www.usgbc.org/DisplayPage.aspx?CMSPageID=2191

When: Wednesdays at 5:00 – 7:30 pm, 5 sessions beginning 10/20/10.

Where:  UMass Physical Plant building, Conference Room A, 360 Campus Center Way, Amherst, MA (free parking available after 5:00pm at the Mullins Center parking lot)

        Session 10/20:  USGBC Programs and Green Building Core Concepts, Online process and study resources

        Session 11/3:    Sustainable Sites and Water Efficiency

        Session 11/10:  Energy and Atmosphere

        Session 12/1:    Materials, Resources and Indoor Environmental Quality

        Session 12/8:    Innovation in Design and Exam Study Tips/ Practice 

Registration: No later than 10/15/10 by email to lpavlova@facil.umass.edu 

Cost: $25 for 5 sessions, including snackes (Cash only, please)

USGBC Lake Hitchcock Committee Calendar and be seen here:

http://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=4ab5k58mjt6oak6m953btujjc4%40group.calendar.google.com&ctz=America/New_York

We already have 10 registered participants, so please email me ASAP if you plan to attend!

Posted in Project Management, Sustainability and Green Building | No Comments »

USGBC Lake Hitchcock Committee

Posted by lpavlova on September 22nd, 2010

I have been busy this summer, though sadly not writing posts on this blog.  One of my main efforts has been to organize a branch of the USGBC in Western MA that supports our green building and sustainability efforts.  So, I’m glad to report that we are off to a good start!  Here is the announcement:

The USGBC Lake Hitchcock Committee  was established on 7/7/10 with the intent of organizing a branch of the USGBC MA Chapter and welcoming individuals who are interested in sustainability for the built environment in our region.  The name of the committee is derived from the area of the Glacial Lake Hitchcock, which was formed 15,000 years ago when the Laurentide ice sheet began to retreat northward along the Connecticut River.  It underscores the importance of regional alliances in supporting a community that is committed to green building and the art of sustainable living. 

The Committee welcomes new members via its Google Docs page here:  http://groups.google.com/group/usgbc-lake-hitchcock?hl=en&pli=1. Current executive committee members include:

Chair: Ludmilla Pavlova, AIA, LEED A.P. BD+C, Senior Facilities Planner and Adjunct Professor, UMass, Amherst

Vice Chair: Brice Hereford, Code Compliance Specialist, Fastenmaster, Agawam

Mahabir Bhandari, Ph.D., DesignBuilder Software, Amherst, MA

Erin Nunes Cooper, AIA, LEED AP, Cooper Green Design, Florence

Katrina Spade, Architecture + Design Graduate Student, UMass, Amherst

Lawson Wulsin, Architecture + Design Graduate Student, UMass, Amherst

Posted in Sustainability and Green Building | 1 Comment »

Designing for Sustainability in the Built Environment

Posted by lpavlova on February 23rd, 2010

Sustainable design is not for the faint of heart.  Modern buildings are complex constructs, requiring years of effort in strategic planning and financing, research, design and execution.  The challenge is particularly difficult, given the current economic and market conditions, for public higher education institutions such as UMass Amherst.  Nevertheless, the University has embarked on a campus-wide green campaign on a number of fronts – organizational, academic, research, and student action, just to mention a few.  A visit to the new UMass GREEN website should give you a great introduction on what is happening on campus and how to get involved.

I would like to highlight one of these efforts: the new Designing for Sustainability in the Built Environment Spring Seminar series.  Loren Walker, Assoc. Director and Research Liaison of UMass Outreach & Technology Transfer and I first conceived it as a deep, public conversation on sustainability research and practice, that would take place between design professionals engaged in construction on campus and UMass faculty who are involved in related research endeavors.  The topics included in this series go beyond the basics of green design and focus on specific challenges encountered as the new campus facilities sought to meet high energy efficiency and sustainability standards (i.e. LEED), and how current research illuminates these issues from the academic perspective.  The Environmental Performance Advisory Council and The Environmental Institute embraced this proposal fully and were the primary sponsors of the series, along with the Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Engagement, Facilities and Campus Planning, and Western MA AIA (the latter will offer professional Continuing Education Units to participants). 

The panel discussions will take place on Thursdays, 3:30 – 5:00 PM at the Cape Cod Lounge, Student Union and are FREE and OPEN to the public.

February 25Overview
Sustainable Design at UMass Amherst
James Cahill, Facilities and Campus Planning, UMass Amherst
David Damery, Dept. of Natural Resources Conservation – Green Building

 March 11Police Station
Monitoring for Sustainability:  Data Acquisition in the Built Environment
James Hannifan, Caolo & Bienek Associates, Steve Kemp, Enermodal Engineering Ltd.
David Irwin, Dept. of Computer Sciences

 March 25Integrated Science Building
Heat Recovery – Efficiency and Safety
Jim Collins and Gary Cabo, Payette
Simi Hoque, Dept. of Natural Resources Conservation – Green Building

April 15Southwest Concourse
Rain Gardens and Stormwater Management
Stephen Stimson and James Royce, Stephen Stimson Assoc. Jack Ahern, Dept. of Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning

 April 29New Science Building
Exterior Facade Design for Maximum Daylighting and Solar Power Generation
Samir Srouji, Wilson Architectsand Chris Schaffner, The Green Engineers
Ray Mann, Dept. of Architecture + Design

Please visit the following websites for additional information and I hope you join us in the conversation!

http://www.umass.edu/tei/TEI/DesigningSustainability.html

http://www.umass.edu/fac/calendar/universitygallery/events/GREENINGTHE.html

http://www.umass.edu/green/

http://www.wmaia.org/continuinged.html

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

New Year Resolution

Posted by lpavlova on January 2nd, 2010

Reduce Household Carbon use by 25%

A recent article in the Huffington Post by David Gershon, the author of the Low Carbon Diet, summarizes the importance of grass roots solutions to the pressing problem of carbon change, now that we have the disappointing international Copenhagen Accord.   When governments cannot agree on how to implement system-wide change, individuals must step up and lead the way.

America represents 20 percent of the planet’s carbon footprint, with half of these emissions coming from the fossil fuels we use to power our homes and cars. And at the community level our collective carbon emissions are between 50 and 90 percent. If, as U.S. households, we were able to reduce our carbon footprint by 25 percent and take this to scale community- and nationwide, we could significantly lower America’s carbon emissions in the short run and buy us the critically needed time for the longer-term solutions to scale up.”

Though difficult, the challenge is not impossible.  What is most important is that we all participate; that we educate ourselves and our children; that we keep our focus on our own personal change; and that we let our actions model the kind of change that we expect from our institutions.  There are many instruments available for household improvements and carbon reduction – here is my short list of favorites:

The New England Carbon Challenge: a place to make visible your carbon reduction resolution and give your community visibility for your efforts.  It has an online calculator that is largely modeled on The Empowerment Institute low carbon calculator.

Massachusetts Climate Action Network: in addition to being a terrific resource for Massachusetts’s residents, this site includes resources on many sustainability topics, from alternative energy to small business, education and energy calculators (to see the resources list click on the Resources Tab).

Massachusetts Interfaith Power and Light: a personal favorite, this website describes in four deceptively simple steps the long path toward carbon reduction.  In addition to simple documents on how to conduct a home energy audit and buy green electricity, it provides an Excel worksheet to download and maintain.  I download a new version and update my old spreadsheet at the time when I prepare my IRS tax forms.  This is an annual chore, but it gives me a good overview of the decisions I have made during the year – both good and bad.   My records date back to 2005 and every year we do a little better.

If you have personal resources that you would like to share, please post them into a comment.  Here is a toast to loosing some more pounds of carbon in the New Year!

Posted in Sustainability and Green Building, Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

Solar Decathlon – a Lever for Growth

Posted by lpavlova on September 19th, 2009

“Give me a place to stand and with a lever I will move the whole world.”[i]

Archimedes_lever_(Small)[ii]

Archimedes’ famous quotation has always been a symbol for me of the power individuals have to change not only their own destiny, but also to affect social and organizational change.  The two prerequisites are: a place to stand, and a lever long enough.

The skills and knowledge we possess form a lever for change in our lives; and those of us who are part of the UMass community have a very steadfast place on which to stand.  As members of a public institution of higher education we are students, teachers, and professionals in the eco-system of a place that has industrial-strength internal mechanisms for operation and production.  Each one of us exercises a degree of power that can be leveraged if we choose to become agents of change for sustainability.

On September 17, 2009 Professor Christopher Jarrett,  Director of the School of Architecture at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, gave a public lecture, hosted by The Environmental Institute and entitled “PowerHouse”.[iii] His talk gave an overview of the U.S. Department of Energy Solar Decathlon competition[iv] and gave insight into the transformational power of multi-disciplinary projects.  After the lecture a small group of interested individuals met to brain-storm the development of a UMass Amherst proposal to enter the competition.  Although a daunting task, everyone agreed that this is a tremendous opportunity to engage in multi-disciplinary research and collaboration that is focused on developing green building solutions.


[i] John Tzetzes (12th century AD) Book of Histories (Chiliades) 2, 129-130,  Translated by Francis R. Walton

[ii] This an engraving from Mechanics Magazine published in London in 1824. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Archimedes_lever_(Small).jpg

[iii] http://www.umass.edu/umhome/events/articles/92081.php

[iv] http://www.solardecathlon.org/about.cfm

Solar Decathlon Proposal Shelved for Two More Years

The Deans of Humanities and Fine Arts, School of Education, Natural Sciences, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Isenberg School of Management, and Public Health, met on November 10, 2009 to discuss the feasibility of the Solar Decathlon 2011 and decided that while it is a very exciting proposal, they were not collectively prepared to support the project at this time.

The faculty who supported the project will continue their work and hope to revisit the issue in two years time.

Next Meeting: October 6, 4:00 – 6:00OM, Fine  Arts Center 3rd fl. Conference Room

Christopher Jarrett Lecture & Solar Decathlon RFP Kick-off Meeting

http://www.solardecathlon.org/about.cfm

September 17, 2009 Meeting Notes

Submitted by Ludmilla Pavlova

Participants:

Ray K. Mann, Architecture & Design, RFP principal writer

Paula Rees, MA Water Research Resource Center (WRRC)

Sharon Tracey, The Environmental Institute

Christine Rogers, Public Health

Julian Rosario, Architecture & Design

Charlie Curcija, Center for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Architecture & Design

Patrick Quinlan, Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, Wind Energy Center

Frank Slleegers, Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning

Thomas Long, Five College Architecture

Ludmilla Pavlova, Campus Planning, Building Materials and Wood Technology

Discussion Notes

  1. Christopher Jarrett emphasised the importance of developing a concept of how a Solar Decathlon project from Umass Amherst would provide unique opportunities for institutional growth and learning.  This is a truly multi-disciplinary endeavor; the undertaking would expand on existing bridges between disciplinary strengths and develop new ones that previously did not exist.
  2. In order for this project to be successful as a student learning opportunity it must be tied into existing and new curriculum.  Developing a list of seminar talks and courses that would be committed to utilizing student participation is essential for mobilizing the greatest of number of students.
  3. This project would not succeed without significant community involvement, particularly from solar energy companies that would need to underwrite or contribute in-kind materials for the project construction.
  4. Project success is measured in terms of very clear performance benchmarks, which emphasize energy generation and ability to support high electrical loads from house appliances.  It is critical to get commitment of support from companies that provide the most efficient PV and appliances.
  5. Which one of our business partners would right a $200,000 check?
  6. Institutional support for this project is critical, both in terms of communication and fundraising.  It is also a tremendous opportunity for engaging the enthusiasm of the greater community and will ripple through every level of the organization – not only the academic disciplines, but athletics, housing and the administrative support structure.

Next Steps:

  1. Ray will meet with Loren Walker/ Research and Engagement.
  2. Ray and/or Ludmilla will ask EPAC to place the team on their agenda so we can solicit their support.
  3. Ludmilla will put together a preliminary project web page and post the notes from the first meeting.
  4. All team members will work to inform and engage others in the UMA community in participating in the visioning process.
  5. Please use this link to indicated your availability for the next visioning meeting:
    http://www.doodle.com/rhf8y83suswkg6ws

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Why Project Management?

Posted by lpavlova on August 13th, 2009

I have a passion for architecture.  And although I love the creative design process, I found myself drawn to work as a project manager and planner at a large institution because it offered me an opportunity to understand how design decisions and construction details affect the performance of buildings throughout their lifecycle.  After almost ten years as a project manager and planner at UMass Amherst – a public research university with over $10M GSF of buildings – I am still hooked on the demands and rewards of the work.  I have found that the world of project management provides many opportunities to engage in critical thinking and to apply creative principles to the resolution of what are often very real problems: how to best define a project program, what optimal design solution should look like, how it can be executed in the most efficient and responsible manner, how the team’s efforts will meet the inevitable functional, financial and resource challenges and how the campus footprint will effect the regional ecology.

Surprisingly, I have yet to discover a resource that integrates principles of project management for both design and construction and that does so from the point of view of the multiple disciplines that are engaged (please direct me if you know of one).  What is even more disheartening is that I have found few public forums where professionals meet to exchange ideas, discuss challenges and share information about the project process.  The building industry is very fragmented and complex, often dependent upon traditional knowledge that is carefully guarded, and highly regulated by legislative and legal requirements.  This makes teaching design and construction, particularly as the industry shifts toward new paradigms in order to become more sustainable, very challenging.

The US Green Building Council recently articulated an amazingly bold vision for its members: “Buildings and communities will regenerate and sustain the health and vitality of all life within a generation”.[1] The bar for transformation of the building industry has been raised high and will require a great deal of personal leadership on the part of the current generation of LEED accredited professionals.

As a LEED A.P. I embrace fully this vision and am at the same time daunted by theobstacles that must be overcome.  What kind of change must I implement in my own practice in order to assure that I have a positive contribution?  What constitutes a generation – i.e. how much time do I have?  Given my age, will I be able to witness the fruits of this vision or will my generation fail, leaving an even greater challenge for the next?  As a practitioner and part-time academic, how much of my energy should be focused on my own practice and how much of it can I devote to sharing my experience with the next generation of building professionals?

As a sustainability advocate and LEED A.P. I fully embrace this vision and am at the same time quite daunted by the obstacles that must be overcome.  What kind of change must I implement in my own practice in order to assure that I have a positive contribution?  What constitutes a generation – i.e. how much time do I have?  Given my age, will I be able to witness the fruits of this vision or will my generation fall short of the goal, leaving an even greater challenge for the next?  As a practitioner and part-time academic, how much of my energy should be focused on my own practice and how much of it can I devote to sharing my experience with the next generation of building professionals?

This blog is my attempt to grapple with these questions in a way that is open to outside influences.  At minimum, it is an effort to inform students in my course on Project Management for Design and Construction of the many complex issues that await them if they decide to work as designers, engineers and builders.  I also hope to use this medium as a form of a diary of my own thoughts that will be open to discussion by others – friends, colleagues, students and interested individuals.  It can serve me as a vehicle for two important goals: i) my personal and professional evolution in developing the skills needed to contribute positively to my ecosystem, and ii) deepening my understanding of the field of project management as it can be applied to the greater project of sustainability.  When all is said and done, creating healthy, regenerative communities will occur via many projects, small and large, in which building industry professionals will be providing the leadership, technical expertise and hard work necessary for the vision to be realized.

Project Management as a specialized field of knowledge is still in its early phases: it is barely a century old, having begun roughly with Henry L. Gantt’s introduction in the 1910′s of charts to represent in graphic form schedules for industrial production.  Gantt, a mechanical engineer, worked with Frederick W. Taylor, who was the first to develop scientific management principles to improve industrial efficiency in turn of the century steelworks.  In the context of WW1 and the Soviet revolution, Gantt believed that “the business system must accept its social responsibility and devote itself primarily to service”.[2] His words still ring true, particularly as the free market system of production faces the challenge of redefining what is of value and what is the true cost of production in order to take into consideration ecological costs to our planet and our human community.

The knowledge base for the scientific management of production has grown considerably since Gantt’s time, having been enriched by experiences from the construction of major public projects – from the Hoover Dam to the Alaska Pipeline – and so has a specialized sub-set of principles focused on project management.  With the establishment of the Project Management Institute in 1969 there is now a Project Management Body of Knowledge Guide (4th edition) and there are 6 distinct PM credentials – a sign of increased codification of principles and skills.  Whereas the Design Construction industry has embraced the Project Management model of planning and control, particularly the tripod of scope/quality, schedule and budget, there is still a great deal of room for improvement and growth of understanding, particularly in taking into account the complexity of constraints brought about by the need to integrate engineered and living systems.

Thinking about how building projects need to be managed so that they account for the full cycle of the built environment – from conception through to operation and demobilization – is a major part of the work of sustainability advocates.  And that starts with the need for individuals to redefine their own personal contribution and to rethink their role as managers, regardless of whether they are owners, designers, engineers, manufacturers, constructors, legal representatives, operators, or any other of the many participants and stakeholders in the building community.  When it comes to the built environment – both existing and newly conceived – each one of us must take responsibility for our own actions and inputs.

If we can agree that, from the perspective of building professionals, Sustainability requires us to “Respect the limits of natural systems and non-renewable resources by seeking solutions that produce an abundance of natural and social capital”[3] , then we must re-think our practice and rewrite the textbooks on design and construction.

I welcome you to these pages and hope that they can be a place for thoughtful discussion of how professionals must integrate disciplinary knowledge and personal agency in order to transform the culture of practice toward the regeneration of the built environment.

Ludmilla Pavlova, AIA, LEED A.P.

Works Cited:

[1] US Green Building Council webpage, About USGBC:
http://www.usgbc.org/DisplayPage.aspx?CMSPageID=124

[2] Gantt, Henry L. Organizing for Work. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Howe, 1919. http://www.ganttchart.com/OrganizingforWork.pdf

[3] US Green Building Council webpage, About USGBC, Guiding Principles:
http://communicate.usgbc.org/usgbc/2006/08.15.06_guiding_principles/guidingPrinciples/

Posted in Project Management, Sustainability and Green Building | 2 Comments »