Monthly Archives: November 2018

Magnuson CogSci talk at noon Wednesday in ILC N400

James Magnuson (https://magnuson.psy.uconn.edu/) will present a talk sponsored by the Five College Cognitive Science Speaker Series in ILC N400 from at noon Wednesday 27th. Pizza will be served. The title and abstract are below. All are welcome!

EARSHOT: A minimal neural network model of human speech recognition that learns to map real speech to semantic patterns

James S. Magnuson, Heejo You, Hosung Nam, Paul Allopenna, Kevin Brown, Monty Escabi, Rachel Theodore, Sahil Luthra, Monica Li, & Jay Rueckl

One of the great unsolved challenges in the cognitive and neural sciences is understanding how human listeners achieve phonetic constancy (seemingly effortless perception of a speaker’s intended consonants and vowels under typical conditions) despite a lack of invariant cues to speech sounds. Models (mathematical, neural network, or Bayesian) of human speech recognition have been essential tools in the development of theories over the last forty years. However, they have been little help in understanding phonetic constancy because most do not operate on real speech (they instead focus on mapping from a sequence of consonants and vowels to words in memory), and most do not learn. The few models that work on real speech borrow elements from automatic speech recognition (ASR), but do not achieve high accuracy and are arguably too complex to provide much theoretical insight. Over the last two decades, however, advances in deep learning have revolutionized ASR, with neural network approaches that emerged from the same framework as those used in cognitive models. These models do not offer much guidance for human speech recognition because of their complexity. Our team asked whether we could borrow minimal elements from ASR to construct a simple cognitive model that would work on real speech. The result is EARSHOT (Emulation of Auditory Recognition of Speech by Humans Over Time), a neural network trained on 1000 words produced by 10 talkers. It learns to map spectral slice inputs to sparse “pseudo-semantic” vectors via recurrent hidden units. The element we have borrowed from ASR is to use “long short-term memory” (LSTM) nodes. LSTM nodes have a memory cell and internal “gates” that allow nodes to become differentially sensitive to variable time scales. EARSHOT achieves high accuracy and moderate generalization, and exhibits human-like over-time phonological competition. Analyses of hidden units – based on approaches used in human electrocorticography – reveal that the model learns a distributed phonological code to map speech to semantics that resembles responses to speech observed in human superior temporal gyrus. I will discuss the implications for cognitive and neural theories of human speech learning and processing.

Di Canio colloquium Friday Nov. 30

Christian DiCanio of the University of Buffalo will present a colloquium entitled “Is intonation universal?” on Friday Nov. 30th at 3:30 pm in ILC N400 (abstract below). The talk will be followed by a reception. All are welcome!

Abstract. Languages with large lexical tone inventories represent a unique challenge to studies of intonation and prosody. Such languages typically involve less freedom for suprasegmental properties of speech to be manipulated for indicating either pragmatic meaning or phrasal constituency (Connell 2017). Might it be possible for a complex tonal language to lack intonation altogether? In this talk, I report on two phonetic studies carried out in the field examining how the nine complex tones of Itunyoso Triqui (Otomanguean: Mexico) are affected by information structure (broad focus, narrow focus, contrastive focus) and utterance boundaries. Though prosodic lengthening occurs, tones are surprisingly consistent across these contexts, maintaining both their shape and height. These findings are examined in relation to an emerging typology of the tone-intonational interface and in comparison with a set of parallel experiments carried out on a related language with a complex tonal system (Yoloxóchitl Mixtec, c.f. DiCanio et al 2018). What seems to distinguish tonal languages with strong intonational effects from those with weak effects is the degree to which prosodic and pragmatic distinctions have been grammaticalized as non-suprasegmental processes, a fertile topic at the interface of linguistic fieldwork, phonetics, and phonology

Tom Roeper quoted in the Atlantic

Via UMass news

Thomas Roeper, linguistics, says learning language from a special application on a smartphone isn’t quite the same as learning from a human teacher. He says a teacher can hold a student’s attention better and can tailor lessons to the individual’s talents. “There are all kinds of contextual factors in language learning. It would be hard for an app to take them all into account,” Roeper says. (The Atlantic, December 2018)

DELV Relaunch

From Tom Roeper

The Diagnostic Evaluation of Language Variation (DELV) was developed by a cooperative team from the Linguistics Department and Communications Disorders Dept in 2005.  It is now being relaunched with a new publisher: Ventris. https://www.ventrislearning.com/delv/

This disorders test is designed to probe deep principles of grammar (long-distance wh-movement, wh-pairing, quantification, pragmatics, etc) without being biased against dialect speakers, particularly AAE speakers.

The DELV has been used with Navajo, Appalachian, Canadian, Australian children, and translated into Afrikaans.   Ideas
of further extensions, possible translations and potential applications are all welcome.

The DELV included many faculty from linguistics, beyond the authors Harry Seymour, Tom Roeper, and Jill deVilliers (to whom Peter deVilliers and Barbara Pearson have been added): Lisa Green, Lisa Selkirk, Peggy Speas, Angelika Kratzer, Joe Pater, and John Kingston were all involved in major and minor ways.  In addition many students were involved: Bart Hollebrandse, Mike Dickey, Elena Benedicto, Deanna Moore (and I hope I have not forgotten anyone).

      The original team met November 15th at the ASHA (American Speech and Hearing Association—20,000 attendees) for a wonderful re-union and brainstorming session with Robert Ventris our new publisher.
      Many of the ComDis PhD’s joined us including: Valerie Johnson [starting a new comdis program at Rutgers], D’Jaris Coles (Andrews University), Eliane Ramos (FIU), Janice Jackson, and former ComDis faculty Shelley Velleman (now chair at U of Vermont) and Christine Foreman.
     Presentations by Jill deVilliers, on new tests (Chinese,
Roma,and  Spanish) were presented. AAE and word-learning, and a variety of other subjects were given in lectures and posters.

Publication of UMOP 40: The Leader of the Pack: A Festschrift in Honor of Peggy Speas

The GLSA is happy to announce the publication of UMOP 40: The Leader of the Pack: A Festschrift in Honor of Peggy Speas edited by Rodica Ivan.

This volume, UMOP 40, includes a collection of papers by students, former students and colleagues, in honor of the ever wonderful Peggy Speas. We are forever in Peggy’s debt for inspiring all this wonderful work in so many different areas of Linguistics over the years. This list of papers, including contributions in Syntax, Semantics, Phonology, Morphology and Language Processing, is only a small sample of all of the brilliant work Peggy advised, inspired, and improved. Contents: Verbal Classifiers in Sign Languages. . . Agreement vs AGREE? (Elena E. Benedicto), The semantics of the future in Navajo (Elizabeth Bogal-Allbritten), Class Structure: Verb Classes as Argument Structure in Cherokee (Leah Chapman), Parasynthetic verbs: The Missing Category (Eva J. Daussà), Indexiphors: Notes on embedded indexicals, shifty agreement, and logophoricity (Amy Rose Deal), How Do Children Deal with Shifted Indexicals? (Jill de Villiers, Ann Nordmeyer & Tom Roeper), Valence Shifting Operations in Navajo (Theodore Fernald & Ellavina Perkins), A note on the prosody and interpretation of final phrases (Lyn Frazier & Charles Clifton Jr.), Who knows what and how? New Evidence about the Acquisition of Evidentials in Tibetan (Jay L. Garfield & Jill de Villiers), Pseudo-pronouns, Honorifics, and Generic Terms in Dhivehi (Amalia E. Gnanadesikan), Negative Inversion and Conditionals in African American English (Lisa Green), What ‘other people’ mean to ‘us’ (Christopher Hammerly), Multiple Exponence and Fission: Number in Muskogee Creek (Kimberly Johnson), To give someone their innocence again (Kyle Johnson), A phonological analysis of verb agreement in sign languages (Noriko Kawasaki), Point of View and the Behavior of Korean Demonstratives (Min-Joo Kim), On the limited set of evidential types (Andrew McKenzie), Dependencies are all alike; every illusion is illusory in its own way (Shayne Sloggett, Caroline Andrews & Brian Dillon), When is Positing Covert Ergative Case Justified? (Ellen Woolford) Peggy, thank you for being such an amazing researcher, teacher, friend and overall incredible human being. Thank you for all the light you bring into our hearts and minds.

The volume is available for purchase hot off the press at: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1729697488

Bobaljik Colloquium Fri. Nov. 16 at 3:30

Jonathan Bobaljik (Harvard University) will present a colloquium on Friday Nov. 16th at 3:30 on “Syncretism, Person, and a Chukotkan Inverse? *næ-“. All are welcome – a reception will follow.

Abstract (includes joint work with Uli Sauerland)
This talk looks at syncretism in paradigms of person marking (pronouns, agreement) in both a large, cross-linguistic perspective and in a detailed case-study of apparently unusual paradigm structures in Chukotkan languages. We pursue the idea there are true linguistic universals in the domain of person-marking, masked by instances of accidental homophony (and other ‘surface noise’). We offer a proposal for inferring the most likely feature structure from the observed distribution of paradigm types, recognizing that not every attested observation reflects a deep property of these systems. In the second part of the talk, I look at one such ‘irregular’ paradigm, and provide a specific proposal for how it is to be best described synchronically and what its historical source is within Chukotko-Kamchatkan. The analysis offered bears on the typology of ‘inverse’ marking, concluding that the Chukotkan prefix*næ- is not an inverse marker, contra Comrie and others.

Report from BUCLD

From Tom Roeper

BUCLD (Boston University Child Language Development) Nov 2-4 saw many students faculty and alumni come together as usual and with our traditional dinner Saturday night.

There were talks and posters by all of these folks:
Jill deVilliers and Jessica Kotfila
     LD wh-movement and tense
Ken Drozd and Bart Hollebrandse on quantifier spreading across 17 langauges
     (with 22 others including Uli Sauerland)
Jennifer Spenader on quantifier spreading
Suzi Lima on recursion and plurals in an Amazonian language
Barbara Pearson and Janice Jackson on African American English
Ana Perez on recursion and productivity
Angeliek van Hout on causation and events
And Jill deVilliers gave an invited talk on wh-movement and False Belief at the  conference the day before on cognitive and linguistic approaches to False Belief.