My, it has been a while…

Once again I return to this space to brainstorm for a bit. The question at hand, how to synthesize rhetorical choices and the ever present hyperlink.

To begin with, I suppose it is worth noting that all hyperlinks are made as rhetorical choices and strategies, forcing the connections and strongly suggesting certain readings of a text. In a way, they serve as a form of manipulation, though this is certainly very cynical wording, ushering readers through space and making meaning with associations from one word, phrase, site, to another. In this way, an understanding of how links work to develop a greater sense of transparency around them is incredibly important when approaching a digital literacy, encouraging students to not only follow links and ask why they exist, but to CREATE them, forging those connections for themselves and learning to think about the inherent power structures behind who links to what and why.

The use of hyperlinks in a composition classroom also really opens up the scope of what students can say/access/reference. It increases the scope of a work, allowing it to reach out to other, more global resources and examples of the arguments presented, creating a more material (though hyper-material) network of community and knowledge that students can tap into and converse with. Links are writing; they communicate through the arrangement of words, images, opinions, “facts”, across time and space to make meaning, expanding the resources available to students in their composition.  

Of course all of this depends on students having access to computers and the knowledge of how to create hyperlinks and why they may be useful.  The division between those who have this access and those who do not seems great, though I have done no real research on it.  I can say, though, that most of my students are fans of facebook and youtube, and that for those students I wonder how transparent linking and the power it represents is.  (The answer seems like not very, but again my cynicism comes out.)   I am only a few years older than my students (admittedly, this is the last year I can say that, being only a few weeks away from exiting their age range), but for many, their intimacy with electronics, from cell phones and iPods to computers and the web, is incredible.   But how much do they, or any of us, understand about the technology they use?

Not sure what to do with this now that I am teaching… There is a part of me that really wants a class blog, but I don’t know that I am quite there yet.

Oh, and facebook is already a problem in the computer classroom.  Day 1.

(Triumphant? I am not sure. I am starting to appreciate this blog thing more and more though. I do maintain it has yet to become a public audience for me, and yet it is not quite private either - ah, pregnant with possibilities… such a great phrase… nevertheless the plotting continues.)

SPRING - just the thought that it will come again makes is wondrous.

As I write I am positioned such:

a) first proposal comments have strongly suggested moving more towards either a class blog or a web site using Dreamweaver. Dreamweaver bums me out because I really do think it is valuable for students to learn on open software, particularly because this class is not aimed at teaching them to be proficient in a certain program as much as it is about helping them to create or participate in community using technology. I know on the one hand there is value to using what you’ve got, but on the other it seems as though using expensive/exclusive software is supporting all the crap I would prefer to work against.

b) I think the blog could be interesting, though I have to admit the web site may actually be more in line with what I want to do. For the blog we could have multiple administrators, still allowing group work for unit 4, which is good (though also possible through a website). Also, we could have daily class participation grades with required postings (perhaps send around a sign up sheet, students have to post a summary of news events or local events or something the night before, we come in, read them, respond online?), which would be a remediation of the quick presentations I have secretly been wanting to do for a few semesters now. I liken this experience to that of waking up and reading a morning newspaper, the Class Edition.

c) This also comes after having wandered about some and come across the Nau blog (http://blog.nau.com/), “The thought Kitchen.” While this is the blog of a clothing company which claims interest in sustainable living and such (I write “claim” not because I have any reason not to believe them, but because this seems to have become a huge identity reified into the market, and on which somebody is making lots of bucks without addressing the issue of capitalism…). I like the blog (even after aforementioned analysis), and I like the idea of the students having a place to bring to their classmate’s attention various ideas and issues they are interested in.

Perhaps if we were to draw this out a little, we could propose each student posting a handful of times, say three, four throughout the semester, counting as participation. The entries could be focused around either news/current events (local/national/international), reviews of local business, info on clubs and so forth… Every morning when students come in we can take the first few minutes to read and respond to blog entries, again counting towards WN or participation. And it seems as though multiple people can read and respond to blogs at once, though I guess there is the possibility of things getting sticky during the posts the night before.

In which case… Could each person then use their own blog to post their initial comments (UMass blogs?)?

d) In terms of the ending project for Unit 4, the blogs may not be as successful in creating a larger scaled group-produced project. And while there is no doubt sexy and sophisticated ways to link through a blog (after all, there is a “code” tab on the very screen where I type now), I don’t know them, and if I am going to have to learn Dreamweaver anyway, shouldn’t I just go with that? Probably. I like the idea of deep links - I am very visual, finding this to be a good way to be very visual with the ways that text/writers/readers are interrelated.

So what is more important? The daily work or the final project? That seems like a loaded question.

Tech Fellows Proposal, Spring 2008 – Draft

1-2) The scope of this project spans over the entire 112 curriculum with an overarching theme, culminating in the collaborative production of a class digital publication in the 4th unit.  The theme guiding the course explores some of the possible intersections of community, both within and outside the classroom walls, and technology/digital literacy, encouraging students to reflect on their own role in both and what it means to be in a particular place during a particular time.  The internet provides us with the ability to not only make connections and interact between local and global communities, but also to share experiences with potentially large audiences and build community membership and participation.  Because this project will look at several levels of community, digital writing, specifically with wiki’s, allows students to not only participate in collaborative writing within the classroom, but remediate projects onto the web, broadening the scope of their own work to include several spheres of readers, from classmates and instructor, to the larger UMass community and beyond.  Authorial credibility will be a part of discussion in all units, as well as the expression of voice for different audiences, the importance of context and the rhetorical situation, and an understanding of design through not only rhetorical choices but light programming, particularly in the last unit. 

 

It has been my (brief) experience that often freshman are hesitant to become active participants in the community around them, identifying more with the towns where they grew up than with the place where they currently reside.  This results in them inhabiting a space where their only connections are with a relatively limited social group, which may limit their exposure to diversity and their exploration of social issues and action.  While I would certainly never want to discourage their relationship to their hometowns or friends, I want to encourage students to begin to explore the area around them now, giving them permission if only for a semester to become more active participants in the Amherst community as well as in UMass.  For the most part, assignments for this course will mirror closely those of the traditional Englwrit 112 curriculum, but with a twist to encourage aforementioned themes and a greater inclusion of technology use in the classroom.  Each of the first three units will also provide a potential text for later revision and inclusion in the Unit 4 project. 

 

This said, the first unit will continue to guide students towards reflection of self and context, analyzing these elements to create a clearer understanding of the space from which each student enters the classroom.  More specifically, this unit will take the form of an expanded ‘This I Believe” essay, encouraging students to examine their context with added emphasis on the values and beliefs that guide actions.  I feel that this approach provides an excellent opportunity for participants to begin the process of uncovering areas of interest as well as core values that will help guide them through the rest of the semester, asking them to question their motivations and drives, and using writing to discover possible reasons for doing what they do.  

 

Unit 2 will also remain fairly consistent with the 112 curriculum, working to expand the exposure of students to issues that extend both globally and locally, learning to effectively summarize, respond to, and analyze texts through essay writing.  Reading and discussing works from the Text Wrestling book, students will be encouraged to closely analyze the texts themselves as well as relate the text to their own lives, contemplating the effects of genetic engineering on their eating habits and lifestyle in conjunction with Barbara Kingsolver, for example, or the ways that social forces may be acting to influence their world views in conjunction with Barry Lopez.  The essays selected for class discussion will be ones that hold pertinence to the local Amherst/Connecticut River Valley area, and though time allowances will restrict the amount of time spent with the connections, the hope is that the seed will be planted for the remaining units to come. 

 

These ties between local and global continue through to Unit 3, as students integrate research into their writing projects.  The main difference here with the traditional curriculum lies in the topic selection for the unit, as students will be more restricted than they normally would be in their research.  While I find incredible productivity in allowing students to choose a topic they are interested in to research free of restrictions, for the scope of this project students will be required to choose topics that relate to the surrounding community, either UMass or the Amherst area (or both), beginning to historicize the area they currently occupy.  There are several approaches to this essay, which will hopefully make it more accessible to students, including the relation of global events or conversations to local and student movements or opportunities for action, reviews and discussions of local attractions or activities, and exploring the history of the area.  Internet research will play a large role in this activity, as well as print sources. 

 

A list of topics will be provided for students, as well as the ability to come up with alternatives, assuming that they are consistent with the vision of the assignment.  Possible topics include local industry, myths about the area, a look at actions in the area concerning sustainable living, student run business on campus, local response to domestic violence and violence against women (as well as other social causes), and reviews of area restaurants, coffee shops, and so forth, with emphasis on the economic and ethical background.  While many of these topics may prove difficult to research, students will be encouraged to go into the community and experience different aspects of the town in which they are inhabiting, looking past the mere existence of book stores, for example, peering instead into demystifying the workings of the economy of publishing, or an investigation on textbooks and the options available to students in purchasing them. 

 

Finally, Unit 4 will culminate in the dramatic revisions of one of the above unit essays for potential publication in an online class wiki.  While all students will be required to revise a draft for this purpose, the publication will be optional, and students will also have the choice of using an alias in publishing the piece.  Ideally, a brief peer revision will take place where students can gain experience editing wiki entries as well.  The purpose of this project will be to not only provide students with experience dramatically revising an essay, but also with thinking about ways in which digital writing changes the way we look at a piece, not only through the introduction of a “real” audience, but also through the need in this case of more precise writing, and the ability to collaboratively create a work which does not remain static, but takes on the dynamic qualities of a entry which others can access and manipulate. 

 

Through the launching of this wiki, students will participate in the remediation of not only their essays, but of community space onto the internet.  As each piece will deal with as aspect of life at UMass and in Amherst, it would be ideal for links to the work to be accessible to the outside community as well as the UMass community, but decisions about advertising and obtaining audiences are ones that are perhaps better decided by the class as a whole than by myself.  The ability for this project to extend to future semesters or other 112 courses could allow for future work to be done in this area, deepening our understanding of the role of the internet and technology in creating and sustaining a sense of community and working as a tool to help students access the opportunities that exist in the area beyond their immediate experience in dorms and in classes.  

 

3)  For the most part the only forms of writing new to the traditional 112 curriculum will be writing using wiki’s, which introduce increased involvement with collaborative writing and a closer understanding of knowledge as it can act as collective property within a community.  The wiki best corresponds with the Unit 3 essays, as these are the most appropriate to not only offer to members of the area for reference but are also the most appropriate for revision by viewers at a later date. 

 

4) Students will learn some coding to use the wiki, bringing them closer to the creation process or digital media and text, though because of time limits this will most likely be limited.  The use of SPARK will also be prominent in the class, as students will be asked to post and respond to drafts, and have access to the class calendar.  I would also like to explore further the use of the site for a class blog, to allow students access to various materials and handouts, though this may or may not be a significant part of the course. 

 

5) Grading criteria for the Unit 4 projects will focus on the essay revisions, since participation in the wiki will be optional.  Each revision will be read for conciseness of language and ideas, appropriateness for a public audience, appropriateness of topic in conjunction with larger class theme, the amount of revision that took place, and with consideration of the effectiveness of the final product itself. 

 

6) The most effective method for judging how well class goals are met will be through Reflective Writing on each unit and through the Final Reflection, during which students will look back on their experiences and share the ways in which the course effected their writing and sense of community at UMass Amherst.  Because the goals for this course extend beyond the walls of the classroom, success will register not only in increased competency and comfort in writing and digital text production, but also in the view students take of the community in which they have landed (purposefully or not), and their understanding of the context and history which they themselves now interact with daily during the school year.  My hope then, is that this course will continue to influence the way students interact with their surrounding environments long after the semester ends, a goal which will be virtually impossible to follow up on without future interviews with students (which might actually be productive…). 

 

7) Is there time for all this??  Will there be enough to write on for Unit 3?  I have a list of topics, but I don’t know if they will all produce a 5 page essay…

In no particular Order…

  • ghost stories/local myths/superstition/folk tales
  • history of UMass/land grant schools
  • Shakers, Quakers, Puritans
  • local industry
  • Tourist sites, Emily Dickinson
  • aboriginal (?) people of the area
  • cooperative housing - what is it? where is it? why?
  • community service opportunities
  • who was Jeffery Amherst?
  • local sports options
  • hiking, biking, camping - trace trails and parks
  • health
  • environmental concerns, movement, conversations
  • art - galleries, studios, craft shows, murals
  • bookstores, textbooks
  • history of area
  • grassroots community/social organizations
  • local spiritual opportunities/outlets
  • UMass - student activism
  • student run business
  • banking (??)
  • restaurants, bars, pubs
  • music scene
  • coffee shops - who serves what? who offers what in terms of seating, study space
  • local farms and food systems; organic agriculture, sustainable living
  • B&B industry
  • local groups like Amherst Survival Center that connect larger social issues to local level
  • local/state politics/politicians; info on voting and acts/laws being circulated or discussed; activity relating to City Council